Aguilera, G. y Galleguillos, H. (2022). Peritajes en procedimientos reformados: Análisis y valoración. Materiales Docentes 56, Academia Judicial de Chile.

Allen, R. (2013). The conceptual challenge of expert evidence. Discusiones Filosóficas 14(23), 41-65.

Allen, R. y Miller, J. (1993). The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education?, Northwestern University Law Review, 87.

Appazov, A. (2016). Expert evidence and international criminal justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24340-5

Ballentyne, N. (2019). Epistemic trespassing. Mind 128, 367-395. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx042

Baumberger, C., Beisbart, C. y Brun, G. (2017). What is understanding? An overview of recent debates in epistemology and philosophy of science. En Grimm, S., Baumberger, C. y Ammon, S. (eds.) Explaining Understanding. Routledge.

Boeri, M. y De Brasi, L. (2025). Epistemic Life in the Polis: Ancient Insights into Contemporary Issues. Springer.

Boyd, K. (2017). Testifying Understanding, Episteme 14, 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.53

Brown, James R. (1991). The Laboratory of the Mind. London: Routledge.

Butler, Judith. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627

Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, y Martin Weber. (1989). The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 97(5), 1232-1254. https://doi.org/10.1086/261651

Carnap, Rudolf. (1947). Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carnap, Rudolf. (1963). Intellectual Autobiography. En Schilpp P.A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. LaSalle: Open Court. 3-84.

Carnap, Rudolf. (1932) [1996]. The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language. En Sarkar S. (ed.) Logical Empiricism at Its Peak. New York: Garland Publishing.10-31. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003249573-2

Coady, C. (1992). Testimony. A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press.

Coady, D. (2012). What to believe now. Wiley-Blackwell.

Cohen, D. (1995). Argument is War…and War is Hell: Philosophy, Education and Metaphors for Argumentation. Informal Logic, 17(2), 177-88. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v17i2.2406

Creath, Richard. (1990). Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. California: University of California Press.

Daly, Chris. (2010). An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. Ontario: Broadview press.

De Brasi, L. (2015). Reliability and Social Knowledge-Relevant Responsibility. Transformaçao 38, 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732015000100011

De Brasi, L. (2020). Judicial Decisions, Intellectual Virtues and the Division of Labour.

The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24(2), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719894007

De Brasi, L. (2023). Jueces e injusticias epistémicas: Recomendaciones institucionales y la interdependencia de lo individual y lo estructural. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual

Penal, vol.9, n.1, pp.237-259. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.794

De Brasi, L. (2024). Humildad Intelectual, Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral: Ciencia, Filosofía, Teología. Ediciones Universidad Austral.

De Brasi, L. (2025). La dimensión social de las virtudes intelectuales: El caso del testimonio y la deliberación en cortes colegiadas. En R. Coloma (ed.) Decidir hechos y argumentar con pruebas: Materiales para una teoría de la prueba en los procesos judiciales. Marcial Pons.

De Roo, R., Stevens, L. y de Poot, C. (2025). The impact of institutional authority on forensic evidence evaluation by criminal justice professionals. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2025, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70190

Dellsén, F. y Linnebo, O. (2026). What to do when experts disagree. En Brössel, P., Asunta, A. y Grundmann, T. (eds.) The Epistemology of Experts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003431459-16

Dwyer, D. (2008). The judicial assessment of expert evidence. CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575136

Elgin, C. (2017). True Enough. OUP. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036535.001.0001

Ferrer Beltrán, J. (2007). La valoración racional de la prueba. Marcial Pons.

Ferrer Beltrán, J. (2024). Manual de Razonamiento Probatorio. Marcial Pons.

Fisher, Matthew, & Frank C. Keil. (2016). The Curse of Expertise: When More Knowledge

Leads to Miscalibrated Explanatory Insight. Cognitive Science 40(5), 1251-1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12280

Frege, Gottlob. (1903) [2013]. Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Derived using concept-script. Trad. P. Ebert & M. Rossberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

French, Peter A. (1985). Toward the Headwaters of Philosophy: Curriculum Revision at Trinity University. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 58(4), 615-619. https://doi.org/10.2307/3131709

Fricker, E. (1995). Critical Notice: Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony, Mind 104, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/104.414.393

Fricker, E. (2006). Testimony and epistemic autonomy. En Lackey, J. y Sosa, E. (eds.) The epistemology of testimony. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0011

Frost-Arnold, Greg. (2013). Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science. La Salle: Open Court.

Gascón Abellán, M. (2010). Prueba Científica: Mitos y Paradigmas. Anales de la Cátedra

Francisco Suárez 44, 81-103. https://doi.org/10.30827/acfs.v44i0.500

Gascón Abellán, M. (2013). Prueba Científica. Un Mapa de Retos. En Vázquez, C. (ed.)

Estándares de prueba y prueba científica. Marcial Pons. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2322011.10

Gascón Abellán, M. (2016). Conocimientos expertos y deferencia del juez. Doxa Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 39, 347-363. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2016.39.18

Glock, Hans-Johann. (2008). What is analytic philosophy? Cambridge: CUP. Goldman, A. (2001). Experts: Which ones you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x

Goldman, A. (2018). Expertise. Topoi 37, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9410-3

González, M. (2020). La ciencia y la tecnología aplicadas a la prueba de los hechos en el proceso. Análisis del fundamento y fiabilidad de la prueba neurocientífica. En Andino, J. y Cerrato, E. (eds.) La prueba pericial a examen. Bosch Editor. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1dv0v2k.38

Gordon, E. (2017). Social Epistemology and the Acquisition of Understanding. En Grimm, S., Baumberger, C. y Ammon, S. (eds.) Explaining Understanding. Routledge.

Green, A. (2019). The Transmission of Understanding, Res Philosophica 96, 43-61. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1743

Grimm, S. (2011). Understanding. En Bernecker, S. y Pritchard, D. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge.

Grimm, S. (2012). The Value of Understanding, Philosophy Compass 7, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x

Grimm, S. (2020). Transmitting Understanding and Know-How. En Hetherington, S. y Smith, N. (eds.) What the Ancients offer Contemporary Epistemology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344138-9

Hales, Stephen D. (1997). Ockam’s Disposable Razor. En Weingartner P., Schurz G. & Dorn G. (editores) The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky. 356-361.

Hazlett, A. (2025). Understanding and Testimony. En Lackey, J. y McGlynn, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. OUP https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.29

Hills, A. (2009). Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology, Ethics 120, 94-127. https://doi.org/10.1086/648610

Hills, A. (2016). Understanding Why, Nous 50, 661-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12092

Hills, A. (2020). Moral Testimony: Transmission versus Propagation, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12595

Hu, X. (2019). Is knowledge of causes sufficient for understanding?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1497923

Huemer, Michael. (2008). When is Parsimony a Virtue? Philosophical Quarterly 59, 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.569.x

Jäger, C. y Malfatti, F. (2020). The social fabric of understanding: Equilibrium, authority and epistemic empathy, Synthese, online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02776-z

Kidd, Ian J. (2016). Intellectual Humility, Confidence, and Argumentation. Topoi, 35, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9324-5

Kvanvig, J. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498909

Kusch, M. (2002) Knowledge by Agreement. Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251223.001.0001

Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219162.001.0001

Magee, Bryan. (1971). Modern British Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.

Magee, Bryan. (2014). Clarity in Philosophy. Philosophy 89, 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819114000072

Malfatti, F. (2020). Can testimony transmit understanding?, Theoria. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12220

Malfatti, F. (2021). On understanding and testimony. Erkenntnis 86, 1345-1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00157-8

National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (2009).

Report, Strengthening Scientific Evidence in the United States: A Path Forward. The National Academy Press.

Newton-Smith, W.H. (1981). The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203317211

Nguyen, T.C. (2018). Cognitive islands and runaway echo chambers: Problems for epistemic dependence on experts. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1692-0

Nussbaum, Martha. (1999). The professor of parody: The hip defeatism of Judith Buttler. The New Republic 22, 37-45.

Pritchard, D. (2010). Knowledge and Understanding. En Pritchard, D., Millar, A. y Haddock, A. (eds.) The nature and value of knowledge. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199586264.001.0001

Riggs, W. (2003). Understanding virtue and the virtue of understanding. En DePaul, M. y Zagzebski, L. (eds.) Intellectual Virtue. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252732.003.0010

Saks, M. y Spellman, B. (2016). The Psychological Foundations of Evidence Law. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814783887.001.0001

Schindler, Samuel. (2018). Theoretical Virtues in Science. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381352

Sennet, Adam. (2016). Ambiguity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/ambiguity/>.

Scholz, Oliver. (2009). Experts: What They Are and How we Recognize Them: A Discussion of Alvin Goldman’s View, Grazer Philosophische Studien 79, 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-90000864

Scholz, Oliver. (2018). Symptoms of expertise: Knowledge, understanding and other cognitive goods, Topoi 37, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9429-5

Sklansky, D. (2020). La prueba pericial en los Estados Unidos. En Andino, J. y Cerrato, E. (eds.) La prueba pericial a examen. Bosch Editor. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1dv0v2k.11

Sokal, Alan. (1996). Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity. Social Text 46-47, 217-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856

Sorensen, Roy. (2018). Vagueness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/vagueness/>.

Stone, Alison. 2015. The Politics of Clarity. Hypatia 30, 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12143

Strevens, M. (2013). No understanding without explanation, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, 510-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.005

Strevens, M. (2017). How idealizations provide understanding. En Grimm, S., Baumberger, C. y Ammon, S. (eds.) Explaining Understanding. Routledge.

Tanesini, Alessandra. (2021). Arrogance, polarisation and arguing to win. En Tanesini A. & Lynch M. (editores) Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism. Oxon: Routledge. 158-174. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291395-14

Trout, J.D. (2002). Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding. Philosophy of Science 69(2), 212-233. https://doi.org/10.1086/341050

Taruffo, M. (2013). La aplicación de estándares científicos a las ciencias sociales y forenses. En C. Vázquez (ed.) Estándares de prueba y prueba científica, Marcial Pons. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2322011.11

Vázquez, C. (2015). De la prueba científica a la prueba pericial. Marcial Pons.

Vázquez, C. (2020a). El diseño normativo de las pruebas periciales, a propósito del razonamiento inferencial de los expertos y la comprensión judicial, Discusiones 24, 29-60. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2020.2204

Vázquez, C. (2020b). La división del trabajo cognitivo en la prueba pericial: el juez, las partes, los peritos y las comunidades expertas, Discusiones 24, 113-140. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2020.2207

Vázquez, C. (2024a). Manual de Prueba Pericial. Marcial Pons.

Vázquez, C. (2024b). La conformación del conjunto de elementos de juicio IV: La práctica de la prueba pericial y de la prueba testifical. En J. Ferrer (ed.) Manual de Razonamiento Probatorio. Marcial Pons.

Wagemans, J. (2011). The assessment of argumentation form expert opinion, Argumentation 25, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8

Watson, J. (2021). Expertise. A Philosophical Introduction. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350083875

Watson, J. (2022). A History and Philosophy of Expertise. Bloomsbury Academic.

Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton University Press.

Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195155270.001.0001

Zagzebski, L. (2001). Recovering Understanding. En Steup, M. (ed) Knowledge, Truth and Duty. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195128923.003.0015

Zagzebski, L. (2008). On epistemology. Wadsworth.

Zagzebski, L. 2012. Epistemic Authority. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001

Zagzebski, L. (2019). Toward a Theory of Understanding. En S. Grimm (ed.) Varieties of Understanding. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190860974.003.0007

Zagzebski, L. (2024). Humility for Experts. En Farina, M., Lavazza, A. y Pritchard, D. (eds.) Expertise: Philosophical Perspectives. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198877301.003.0010